Что думаешь? Оцени!
Follow topics & set alerts with myFT
。业内人士推荐旺商聊官方下载作为进阶阅读
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Code runs in a strict sandbox where the only allowed operations are calling functions provided by the host. If the host doesn’t provide a file reading function, the WASM module simply cannot read files. The failure mode here requires a vulnerability in the WASM runtime itself, like an out-of-bounds memory read that bypasses the linear memory checks.
，详情可参考爱思助手下载最新版本
Just… don’t do it with JavaScript ffs.。关于这个话题，爱思助手下载最新版本提供了深入分析
these 3604s in front of each teller, where they could inquire into customer